I understand that the friend Giordani need to download a set of internal evidence synthesis that highlights the striking difference between the government of Hugo Chavez and Maduro, in abysmal perjucio on the latter. But what means this man of the purest and oldest left, more free and therefore more radical, as Saramago and the same?
The problem we have lived for years and is accentuated as brazen in recent years from the beginning, terrible process and tragic outcome of disease Chavez, is that all elements deeply weakened the revolutionary process, cowardice contradict Chavez criteria and opportunism of the leadership, instead of confronting them with compelling reason revolution, what they did was strengthened, making the internal work of the top leadership of the government in a media game of political polarization to the external and an internal dispute between the privileged few by Chávez's decision to stay in power; the pursuit of power for power, which means the end of any revolution. This tacit complicity with the counterrevolutionary enemy, which essentially summarize in three points:
. Blocking socialist revolutionary process by a model aimed at strengthening the bureaucracy, corporatism and state capitalism. Differentiating this failure in the ability of centralized management is not subject willing to change everything, but all men to preserve the basic structure of government in terms of what he denies: the Bolivarian socialist project.
. The total moral breakdown of a large part, the majority in fact, address the revolutionary government. By which evolves the creation of a new bourgeoisie that is slowly taking the basic threads of government.
. Onset and increased year after year autocracy imposed within the political space of Chavez (PSUV, Patriotic Pole), political consequence of the previous two elements, thereby disappearing autonomy of popular power and the right to criticize in view this process.
Such circumstances created the conditions to stop completely the conditions of making something that promotes the revolution in favor of the working classes and the world revolutionary process, an alternative model of building society and popular power. Gradually, and Mr. Giordani knows this because he is one of the leading designers, Venezuelan model was staying stuck in the interests of a dome government no longer asks for the programmatic and strategic success of a revolution but in its ability to stay in power as government leadership. The inability of the notorious right-wing opposition and expertise that these domes were reaching leaders to wrap the bases of Chavez with their interests through state patronage, has allowed them to effectively preserved now in power there is no doubt.
But this has been done at the cost of the lost day day of the fundamental revolutionary goals: concrete exercise of popular power, expropriation of large parasitic capital socialistic redistribution of oil income on social control, establishing a line of government designed to gain progressive national, technology, food, multiplied creating spaces with full production collective self sufficiency, creating economic and political conditions for the expansion of revolutionary purpose within the continental area, consolidation steps sovereignty made by the full exercise of collective participation in the creation of law, etc..
This reagent exercise state government has finally resulted, embezzlement of state resources by this dome government, allied to bankers and oligarchs (and ultimately to the same dignity and elemental that sovereignty had already expelled from this country), the enhancement of the entire rentier capitalism model (with all the consequences that entails from the point of view of categorical inequality in the distribution of this income in favor of big business), and the absence of a development model socialist self-management and to allow us to open the passage to another company. Where only been able to survive fine examples of worker and peasant resistance production control for the purposes of what is wanted by the revolutionary movement are but the heroic survival of a desired revolution, and where many have become folk cases good for excibiciones weekend in ministries or ministerial speeches.
In contrast, the collapse of the national productive apparatus seems to be an event to claim when viewing his speeches balance and how is denoted with pride as Cardinal were able to fill this part of the populist revolution with sharing resources and role of both social missions as state subsidy on housing, gas, electricity and food sales within this populist replacement. One way or another, for years now, with Giordani or Maduro or any other exhibitor, balances are not productive success, collectively creating popular power capacity in handling the defense of revolutionary defense, developed steps regarding the ability to forge new spaces of sociability educational, health, culture, land recovered and placed in clean production, our proven ability to meet the imperialist onslaught, the generation of a military defense strategy around the people, the balance being made. The important thing is mercals few were sold, how many resources were divided in what they call government street and not know how many existing missions, and perennial reorganizations, which in turn are guaranteed votes for new elections. Mr. Giordani sad but not only that but says nothing of the matter is absolute regardless of their excesses with Nicolas Maduro.
Accountability Mr. Giordani not want to touch these substantive matters. Not to speak of the failure of the exchange control had a way contrary to which supposedly did or Socialist Guayana Plan as exemplary pillar of workers' control to extend to the rest of the country.Not talk about corruption! ... Does not explain why the plan ended transformation of state and public participatory planning system designed earlier when I had with Minister Felipe Perez be the head of the Ministry of Planning. Why social missions whose design began as a revolutionary state parallel to the bourgeois and bureaucratic state, ended completely tied to the old state.
It is very interesting to see as a key minister Giordani as it has been sneaking compressing the bulk of their responsibilities to a matter of misunderstanding with the new president and the havoc that the latter has added to public administration, including errors of wanting to supplant Chavez on the same model of leadership, if not arrive or ankles seems. Okay, may be all true, but what happened to the Chinese background and stole everything there?. Mr. Giordani well knows, does not say. Why?, If the culprits lived with him in the same cabinet, and are there, while others came thrown out the window by referring this terrible case of high corruption, I mean people as arrivals to him as Aime Betancourt.
Talk of changing the Sicad SITME of his ailment because you did not get enough personal power to control Cadivi. But, then, is only a problem of misunderstanding or not Giordani or Maduro or anyone in government want to tell the truth of embezzlement that occurred and continues to occur with Sicad I from the viewpoint of an ongoing embezzlement of the nation? . Why not explain the reason for the failure of the production plan and transformation of state model was replaced by the issuance of currency inorganic today results in inflation and desasbastecimiento of such size that poverty appears again mediated and extreme rising reappears unemployment, devaluation of wages and apparent failure increasingly eviente minimum social justice plan?.
Data points certainly seem great pride to his planning for years. Thanks brother but even more never know, because if there's one thing that any revolution needs is beings that unless they fear the loss of their positions of power and what most distresses is if at any time the revolution was replaced by a fight of cogoyos to take in their hands the most important of any state, in our case of oil revenues. It is the realization that many of those do we have lived and made this process from the beginning of rebellion.
Giordani is ultimately part of a leadership in conflict with itself. His authoritarian internal planning ministry prevented attract and retain elements of solidarity and community work already creating internal and thus were able to do so much at a time when the government was falling personality. The typical internal governance of small bourgeoisie who despise arrogant collective intelligence and teamwork was generated. The friend undoubtedly is a typical example of the breakdown of moral and political direction of State knows that mess is currently stuck, but do not want to assume full (by older, free radical and is said ) that's part of it, although it seems the character concerned less immersed in corruption, although he missed everything.
They definitely are a unable to sincerar assume perfectly possible and create the conditions for a complete renovation of the revolutionary process, work that will touch you in time for the revolutionary bases. This is part of the unspoken lines on your account redición: what a bureaucracy that could not ended up being an obstacle, a repressive machinery, rather than a revolutionary instrument, it will have to direct the people in struggle, and no convincing it will be assured that this revolution came to an end.
Giordani probably tell truths director of state and particularly in regard to the last days of the life of Chavez, very serious for the government of Maduro. The set of documents made by your team and not assumed by the new direction during these days will be studied. And we know that everything does not stop there because there are huge gaps in those days unless you have done is clarify, as it is rather than days or months where all sassy dasfalco increase national resources occurs . But Broken assumes thoroughly address the consequences of any failure to love him ascribe all government Maduro and especially his lack of leadership. Half-truths that will create much itching and welt internal but at the end are not essentially saying, far from being the object of this letter rid of all liability to something which has no excuse. These are facts that show to what extent this is not only critical, it is the truth that has been criminalized and will continue happening as the basis of Chavez resigned to follow the mandate of the created autocracy.
Anyway, thanks you their loyalty will Giordani himself. A generation of left side which was just a witness between their professional duties, and who is left behind in statist complements very own bureaucratic paradigms that Cendes old school and the school of economics at the UCV, created in the seventies who never knew how to get out of the ideological and political universe defeated left socialism in the twentieth century. Much was what occurred at the time as contributing to the dependency theory in vogue at the time but it was locked. Too bad Giordani, as a student in his last moments of those lights, failed to understand its strict limits within a globalized capitalism where these theories came to their functional purpose. With all the good will they have been on their side, it was a lousy student of his own master Mezaros for whom the metabolic system of capitalism is only possible to transform it from the strength and intelligence who has warranted it: the working class in each one of the moments of playing capital. Giordani scorned the teachings of their own intellectual master and there are consequences. Not to take any responsibility for it ... okay, but still, far beyond him thank you open signs new time where the truth will be told and the facts finally conjugates in favor of our people and their revolution.
* Roland Denis is revolutionary popular wrestler with long experience in the Venezuelan left. Graduated in Philosophy at the UCV. Was Deputy Planning and Development from 2002 to 2003. 80s As he played for Disobedience movement and then the Ouramérica / Movement Project April 13. He is the author of books Manufacturers Rebellion (2001) and The Three Republics (2012).