Esta nota ha sido leída aproximadamente 80756 veces.
Socialist friends as you know usually do not write in this medium. But I feel compelled by the subject being treated and the person from whom it comes.
First, I just confirmed Jorge Giordani, he HAS NOT WRITTEN OR WILL WRITE ANYTHING MORE THAN YOUR LETTER he did in order to raise before the people and that is, before all of us, the great concern that has assaulted from MORE THAN ONE YEAR, in different relationship situations that had been made and some of them pointing at the famous letter.
I consist Giordani efforts to achieve the President received it in order to to put to many problems and courses of action. Some of these problems came to raise them with the proposed solution, in a significant number of points that were just returned after months, the President, with a signature and marked "DEFERRED" (all with the same date deferral), but without a comment, recommendation, observation ...
The February 14, 2013 (note that had not yet died Comandante Chavez), Jorge Giordani was in the National PSUV and, according to our notes, raised there several things now raised in his letter; result: absolute silence. Here the question arises what is the duty of a revolutionary when it exhausts all avenues to alert about problems that are jeopardizing the proper course of the revolution and those who are responsible for hearing and acting do not listen? You really can be branded a traitor and who acts? I think that we should make an act of profound reflection.
Does Giordani traitor is because, for example, denounced the allocation of dollars to companies briefcase and proposed courses of action to prevent that from happening follow? o traitors are, but that is not said, that the dollars allocated today require hospitals or needed for production and to meet the needs of the people? I think we are diverting attention from what really matters:
Is it that there will be no response to allegations of Giordani? Do we settle for pointing that out as a traitor and therefore not discuss the complaint about the presence of "French group" and what was being negotiated behind the interests of the republic?
I think it behooves us to demand those answers and the related list of companies that benefited from the supply of dollars
Finally a thought: why is it that both national and international financial right, which are ultimately those who benefit when mistakes its sovereign countries in economic policies, are applauding the departure of Jorge Giordani?
I think it behooves us to discuss the substantive and I think the President should, need, ponder over us all act according to the statesman who has responsibility for and assume this enormous challenge, which would also be of great nobility, in the sense of claiming Comrade Jorge Giordani, not in their name, which is well known, loved by the people, remembered many difficult situations faced by Chavez without hesitation, unlike many others which are not only not has described as traitors but also has rewarded them, but answering the many questions that arise from the complaint.
The Revolution is strengthened by the truth, sincerity, transparency. These are qualities of the revolutionaries.
Hector Navarro Diaz. June 23
This note has been viewed about 80756 times.
Hector Navarro Diaz: It was several times minister in the government of President Hugo Chavez. He was in charge of the ministries of: 1) Education, Culture and Sports in 1999, 2) Higher Education in 2002, 3) Science, Technology and Innovation in 2007, 4) Education from 2009 to 5 ) Electric Power. He accompanied the Commander Chávez since the beginning of his administration. Member of the National Directorate of the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV). Electrical Engineer, with a PhD in Manchester, England. Author of at least two international patents in the area of technology. He was professor of the Faculty of Engineering of the UCV. He was also deputy and president of the Andean Parliament? Chapter Venezuela. He chaired the Public Accounts Committee of the National Assembly and the Foreign Policy Committee.